Possess a Prohibited Drug Lawyers

We are the best lawyers for possessing prohibited drug offences.

We have 500+ 5-star Google reviews, which you can read here.

Our expert drug lawyers can help you avoid a conviction so you have no criminal record.

Read below to find out more.

Possess prohibited drug lawyers

For the offence of possessing a prohibited drug, we are expert criminal lawyers with 500+ five-star Google reviews who can assist clients in avoiding a conviction and keeping a clean criminal record.

For first-time possess prohibited drug offences:

  • You will be charged a fixed fee of $2,200.
  • Be represented by a law firm with 500+ five-star Google reviews, which you can read here.
  • Be represented by a senior criminal lawyer with at least 5 years of experience.
  • Be represented by a law firm co-founded by one of the best drug lawyers in Sydney, Joseph Correy.
  • Be represented by a law firm co-founded by Deng Adut, who has won awards such as NSW Australian of the Year, the Law Society President’s Medal, the Pride of Australia Medal, and the Human Rights Award.
  • Support our Community Partnership initiative.

If you have been charged with a drug possession offence, phone us on (02) 8815 8167 or make a website enquiry.

Will I get a criminal record for possessing a prohibited drug?

Possess a prohibited drug carries a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment and/or a fine of $2,200.00; however, these penalties are typically reserved for the worst offenders.

If you are found or plead guilty to possessing a prohibited drug, you will have the offence included on your criminal record unless the court deals with your case by way of section 10.

Australian Criminal Law Group are expert criminal lawyers at getting clients section 10s for possessing prohibited drug offences, meaning our clients are not convicted and have no criminal record despite pleading guilty.

How do I avoid a criminal record?

Our criminal lawyers will assist you in preparing your sentence for possessing prohibited drug offences, including:

  • Negotiating with prosecutors for you to plead guilty to less serious facts or even a less serious charge.
  • Assisting you with references and an apology letter.
  • Obtaining psychological and psychiatric reports.
  • Directing you to other services, such as drug and alcohol programs, counsellors, psychologists, and psychiatrists.
  • Referring you to programs and courses that the courts hold in high regard like MERIT, SMART Recovery, and the Salvation Army’s Positive Lifestyles Program.
  • Helping you collate corroborating documents that show the effect a conviction will have on you such as employment contracts and travel documents.
  • Submitting applications for residential rehabilitation services.

How can I beat a charge of Possessing a prohibited drug?

You will be found not guilty of the offence of Possess a prohibited drug if the police cannot prove beyond a reasonable doubt:

  1. You had a prohibited drug on your person; and
  2. You knew you had the prohibited drug, or you knew of its likely existence, or you believed that it was a narcotic drug of some kind even if you were unaware of the actual type.

Possession means de facto possession or exclusive physical control of the drug. Constructive possession is where the person does not have actual possession but has the legal right to take it whenever the person wishes to do so.

Where the police allege you had exclusive possession of a drug, but the drug is found in a communal place, police must negate possession on the part of any other person, e.g. other occupants of the house in which you live.

What are our results for possessing a prohibited drug?

Case study

We appeared for a person charged with the supply of 110 ecstasy tablets at the Future Music Festival.  His lawyer explained he was holding 88 of those pills for a friend and 22 tablets were to be given to other friends at the festival.  This resulted in successfully convincing the DPP that the ‘ Carey defence’ applied in this case and that the 88 pills should be dealt with on a possession charge.  The matter proceeded to sentence at the District Court.   Over a 9-month period, the judge required our client to undertake weekly urine drug testing. Ultimately, the judge imposed a sentence of two good behaviour bonds, without convictions, for the 88 pills and supply of 22 pills charges.

Case study

We appeared for an Accused person who had been pulled over by the police and drugs found in the side compartment of a company car. Our solicitor argued that the police could not prove the cocaine and methylamphetamine belonged to the Accused as opposed to another person. The Magistrate at Penrith Local Court ultimately ordered that the charges be dismissed and ordered the police pay the legal costs of our client.

Case study

We appeared for a young person who had 10 ecstasy tablets at the Stereosonic music festival. Our solicitor tendered a copy of an employment contract showing that the defendant could lose his job if convicted.  We also tendered bank statements showing that the young person was struggling to repay a mortgage and submitted he would default if he lost his job. The Magistrate agreed that the effect of a conviction on his employment outweighed the need to punish the young person. The Magistrate dismissed the matter pursuant to section 10.  The young person did not get a conviction.

Case study

We appeared for a person charged with supply of 9 grams of cocaine.  We convinced the DPP to withdraw the supply charge and accept a guilty plea to a possession charge.  The matter proceeded to sentence in the Local Court and the magistrate did not record a conviction.

Case study

We appeared for a person charged with the supply of 18 MDMA capsules at a music festival.  He successfully negotiated with the DPP for his client to plead guilty to one count of possession.  This was for having 8 capsules and a supply of 10 capsules to friends for no profit. The matter remained in the local court and was dealt with under Section 10 without conviction.

Case study

We appeared for a young person charged with possession of four ecstasy tablets at a music festival. The young person had received a section 10 for malicious damage four years earlier whilst at university. Our solicitor argued that this did not prohibit the court from using the section a second time. Further arguing that the previous conviction was university skylarking vs. any propensity for criminal behaviour. The Magistrate agreed and dismissed the charge under section 10, recording no conviction.

Get in touch

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Award-winning Sydney Criminal Lawyers

Contact Australian Criminal Law Group now for your FREE First Consultation

Scroll to Top