Firing at Dwelling Houses or Buildings

Firing at dwelling houses or buildings charges can be beaten, especially if there is no DNA or fingerprints on the firearm.  Our criminal lawyers are your best defence if you are charged with firearms offences.  Get in touch.

Firing at a Dwelling, Houses or Buildings Offence

Firing at Dwelling Houses or Buildings, like any offence involving guns, is extremely serious. It puts you at serious risk of being sentenced to prison, potentially for a long time.

Firing at dwelling houses or buildings charges can be beaten, especially if there is no DNA or fingerprints on the firearm. Most people do not walk around with a gun in their holster. It can be difficult for the police to prove a gun is yours if it is found in a home or car used by more than one person.

Australian Criminal Law Group is home to the experts at defending gun charges and for these sorts of offences, you need an experienced criminal lawyer to handle your case. It can be the difference between freedom and prison.

If you intend to plead guilty to Firing at dwelling houses or buildings our criminal lawyers put together the strongest cases on sentence. We use the best counsel to lower the sentence and keep you out of jail with a strong record of getting section 10 no convictions.

How do I beat a charge of Firing at dwelling houses or buildings?

You will be found not guilty of the offence of Firing at dwelling houses or buildings if the police cannot prove beyond a reasonable doubt:

  1. You fired a firearm.
  2. At a dwelling house or other building.
  3. With reckless disregard for the safety of another person.

Pleading guilty

If you agree that you have committed the offence and the police are able to prove so, it is best to plead guilty. You will normally receive a discount on your sentence, and it will demonstrate remorse and contrition. It may also be the case that one of our experienced solicitors can negotiate with prosecutors for you to plead guilty to less serious facts or even a less serious charge.

Firing at dwelling houses or buildings carries a maximum penalty of 14 years imprisonment in the District Court. This penalty is typically reserved for the worst offenders. Firing at dwelling houses or buildings is a serious offence and if you are charged with it you should contact our office immediately.

You can read about all the sentencing options that a court has, including about not having a conviction recorded here.

Why choose Australian Criminal Law Group?

Our criminal lawyers are experts at obtaining the best outcome possible for firearms offences. For these offences, a good lawyer can be the difference between a conviction and no criminal record and freedom or jail. 

To discuss your charge of Firing at dwelling houses or buildings, call Australian Criminal Law Group at our Sydney, Parramatta, and Blacktown offices or make a website inquiry today.

Case Study

Joseph Correy represented a client who was charged with possessing a 9mm pistol. The case against him involved significant amounts of intercepted phone calls in which he was heard sourcing the firearm. Mr Correy obtained additional calls not initially disclosed by the police. These demonstrated that our client was in fear for his safety at the time he sought to obtain the firearm. Police records of a home invasion against him were also obtained. The sentencing judge found that our client was under significant stress at the time he sourced the pistol and did not send him to jail.

Case Study

Mr Harb represented a man charged with two counts of possessing an unauthorised firearm, each carrying a sentence of 14 years imprisonment. The judge took into account that the man had given evidence in unrelated matters.  The judge found that him having the guns was for the purpose of protection. Even though still illegal the judge took this into account and gave a two-year suspended sentence.

Case Study

One of our criminal lawyers represented a young man charged with possessing 8 prohibited firearms. He was stopped by police and the firearms were found in his car. Evidence was called to establish that our client had no criminal associations or criminal records. It was established that he was a keen hunter and firearm enthusiast who had legally obtained weapons. The court accepted our client’s actions. They were not typical of similar cases where there is a risk that firearms will be used for illegal activity. The court accepted the weapons formed part of a collection exclusively used for otherwise legal hunting. The court imposed an intensive correction order and did not send our client to jail.

Get in touch

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Award-winning Sydney Criminal Lawyers

Contact Australian Criminal Law Group now for your FREE First Consultation

Scroll to Top